
Stocks are higher this morning despite higher rates and oil prices. Bonds and MBS are down.
The week ahead is relatively data-light with only new home sales and leading indicators on the agenda. We are in the quiet period ahead of the Fed’s July meeting, so there won’t be any Fed speakers either.
Earnings season has begun and next week we will hear from agency mortgage REITs AGNC Investment and Annaly, homebuilders D.R. Horton, PulteGroup, NVR and Taylor Morrison, Western Alliance, and market bellwethers Google and Tesla.
Consumer sentiment moved sharply higher in July, according to the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Survey. The index rose 10% to reach the highest level since February. Declining gasoline costs were a big reason for the move.
“This month’s rise in sentiment was pervasive across the population, seen across groups by age, income, wealth, and political party. Particularly strong increases were seen among consumers without a bachelor’s degree. However, with prices remaining frustratingly high, consumers are hardly ebullient about the economy; sentiment is down 12% from a year ago. Thus, sentiment’s upward momentum may prove difficult to sustain if recent declines in gas prices continue to reverse course. Interviews for this release spanned June 23 to July 13, with more than 70% completed before the resumption of US strikes against Iran on July 7 and the subsequent increase in gas prices.”
Near-term inflationary expectations declined but remain elevated. Longer-term inflationary expectations were flat.
Industrial production rose 0.1% last month, while manufacturing production was flat. Capacity Utilization fell.
Federal Reserve Vice Chairman Philip Jefferson spoke at Stanford on Friday. He made some interesting points regarding AI and its potential effects on interest rates. The most surprising was his view that AI would increase r-star (or the long-term rate of interest). You would think AI would drive up productivity, thus lowering inflationary pressures and allowing r-star to fall. Productivity increases allow the speed limit of the economy to increase (basically increases non-inflationary potential output) so therefore it should be bearish for inflation and also allow lower rates.
A related consideration is the potential effect of AI on the longer-run neutral rate of interest. Often called r*, this is the real interest rate consistent with the economy operating at its full potential once all shocks have dissipated. If AI leads to permanently higher levels of productivity growth, it may increase firms’ desire to invest and, hence, their demand for funding. Higher productivity growth may also discourage household savings by increasing expected future income. Under these circumstances, to reconcile the increase in investment with reduced savings, r* would likely rise. However, predicting changes in the neutral rate is challenging, given the historically noisy relationship between productivity growth and real interest rates. Furthermore, potential AI-induced increases in inequality could have mitigating effects on r*. High-income households tend to save at higher rates than low-income households. Thus, a rise in income inequality could lead to an increase in the supply of savings, putting downward pressure on the neutral rate.6
On monetary policy, he warned about inflation and the potential for higher rates going forward:
At our last meeting, in June, the FOMC decided to maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 3-1/2 to 3-3/4 percent. This policy stance should continue to support the labor market while allowing inflation to resume its decline toward our 2 percent target as the effects of past tariffs and energy prices pass through completely. That said, in a scenario where actual inflation does not start to cool down soon, I believe that it could be appropriate to reconsider our current policy stance to ensure we fulfill our commitment to deliver price stability.














