
Stocks are flattish this morning as oil and bond yields fall. Bonds and MBS are up.
Oil is dropping as investors hope for a diplomatic solution to the Iranian blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian is set to fly to NY for a meeting at the UN.
Economic growth decreased in August according to the Chicago Fed National Activity Index. Production and sales indicators pulled down the index while consumption and employment indicators were contributors. The CFNAI index showed the economy more or less growing on trend, which is another data point suggesting the Atlanta Fed’s GDP Now model has an issue.
Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee spoke in London yesterday, discussing how the Fed’s thinking has changed regarding supply shocks. The conventional wisdom has been to “look through” supply shocks but the Fed considers that inapplicable in the current situation.
Historically supply shocks were thought to cause a temporary spike in inflation as prices rise and then fall back. Aside from the Arab oil embargoes of the 1970s, most supply shocks like strikes or weather proved to be temporary blips and chasing a temporary blip with something with a long lag like monetary policy was usually the wrong move. By the time monetary policy changes began to affect the economy (usually 6-9 months) the shock was in the rear view mirror.
This is why the Fed has resisted raising rates to tariffs and the Iran war for so long. The tariffs were declared unconstitutional and had a limited time span. The Iran War was supposed to be a short-term event, and even if it stuck around longer than expected, oil companies would increase production to take advantage of the higher prices.
So far that isn’t happening, and high diesel prices (which are a refining issue, not a crude oil issue) push up prices all over. Inflation is still stubbornly high and so far there is no indication it is coming back down. While supply-driven inflation is easier to tame than demand-driven inflation it cannot be ignored and that is Goolsbee’s message.
FHFA Director Bill Pulte said that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will be buying “large quantities” of MBS. The GSEs are authorized to buy up to $200 billion in order to help address affordability.

The unemployment rate is 4.1%, which is super low on a historical basis. Inflation is higher than the Fed’s 2% target, but it isn’t anywhere near the high single digits rate of 2022 or the normal rates we saw in the 70s and 80s. So why is consumer sentiment so low?

Note that consumer sentiment is worse than it was during the depths of the Great Recession, or the high inflation late 1970s. Empirically economic conditions are much, much better today. So what gives? Gasoline prices are playing a part, but Goldman says that happiness in general is much lower, and that is being driven by collapsing trust in institutions.
The Misery Index (unemployment plus inflation) was coined in the 1970s as a way to measure the economy’s comfort level. Note that the misery index today is much lower than it was back then.

I suspect social media algorithms are playing a part here. People interact with content that makes them angry and social media is flooded with nonsense rage bait like this:

400 grand is the new minimum wage, I guess. The point is that social media is flooded with posts like this which retcon history in order to make you mad (and vote socialist). The point is that consumer sentiment indicators have become less useful as a predictor for spending.






















