
Stocks are lower this morning as fighting continues in the Persian Gulf. Bonds and MBS are down.
Energy prices are spiking higher as the fighting spreads in the Gulf and Iran threatens to set any ships on fire that pass through the Strait of Hormuz. The Strait of Hormuz sits between Iran and Oman and is about 21 miles wide at its narrowest point. The strait acts as a choke point for global oil supply, and much of the US Navy’s mission over the past 50 years has been to periodically shepherd oil tankers through the Strait whenever Iran gets a bug up its butt. About 20% of the global oil supply passes through the Strait of Hormuz, so any disruption there will send reverberations through markets.
Iran has attacked a gas facility in Qatar and an oil refinery in Saudi Arabia. Oil prices are up another 7% or so this morning, while natural gas futures are up 5% and gasoline futures are up a similar amount. The US gets almost all of its energy internally (the US is the Saudi Arabia of natural gas), so the threat of any sort of shortage isn’t there. The US oil market (WTI) is entirely separate from the oil that comes from the Gulf. That said, futures correlate so the US is seeing higher energy prices even though the action in the gulf shouldn’t affect anything here, at least in theory.
The US is demanding that Iran give up its nuclear ambitions, stop funding Hamas and Hezbollah, and stop trying to develop ballistic missiles. In return, the US would consider relaxing or ending sanctions. With Iran becoming increasingly isolated in the Gulf perhaps a new government will find that more palatable than the previous one did. Decades of sanctions has meant that Iran has been limited in its ability expand exploration and production and the country does represent a potential source of new global supply. So if the new interim government says “uncle” and Iran goes from chaotic evil to chaotic neutral this would be bearish for energy prices in general.
The ISM Manufacturing Index declined slightly in February as new orders and production expanded more slowly than January. In February, U.S. manufacturing activity remained in expansion territory, although growing at a slower pace than the month before. Of the five subindexes that make up the PMI®, two (New Orders and Production) indicated slower growth compared to the previous month, and the Employment and Inventories indexes remained in contraction.
Most of the comments discussed the problems associated with tariffs, but this one had an interesting point on the employment market: “Business is improving by the week. Backlog is growing, and new opportunities are everywhere. Monthly shipments are still lower than planned, but improving. Over the past five years, we spent thousands trying to attract new employees and had almost zero responses. In the last six months, however, we’ve been able to hire experienced engineers, computer numerical control (CNC) operators, and young people wanting to become CNC machinists.” [Fabricated Metal Products]
The point about being able to hire skilled workers and young people entering the trades means that the prior lack of workers was a market issue, not a structural one. It sounds like more young workers are seeing college for what it is: a negative NPV investment for a lot of majors, and are reacting accordingly.
The S&P Manufacturing PMI shows a similar situation – manufacturing is still expanding, although the pace of expansion has slowed. Weather did have a negative impact on activity, although uncertainty in general from tariffs, to politics (and now geopolitical tensions) have dampened confidence and enthusiasm. “Meanwhile, although cost inflation remained elevated, often linked to tariffs, it is running lower than the peaks seen last year, and stiff competition has limited the pass through to selling prices, which rose in February at the slowest rate for over a year. While this is good news for inflation, it hints at downward pressure on profits.”
Tools for Mortgage Originators
Are you a mortgage originator with a bookkeeper, but no financial analyst? Are you doing without an annual budget because you don’t have the time / resources to develop one? Are you considering an acquisition, and want an in-depth analysis of the potential synergies and impact on the bottom line? Perhaps you have some projects that need to be done, but you can’t justify a full-time hire.
I am a consultant who has extensive experience in capital markets, secondary marketing, FP&A, budgeting, and servicing. If you think you might have a need, let’s set up a discovery call.
Please reach out to brent@thedailytearsheet.com














