
Stocks are higher this morning as we wrap up a lousy Q1. Bonds and MBS are up.
Jerome Powell spoke yesterday and said that the increase in oil prices due to the war in Iran was not a reason to hike rates. “Inflation expectations do appear to be well anchored beyond the short term, but nonetheless, it’s something we will eventually maybe face the question of what to do here,” he said during a question-and-answer question with a moderator and students. “We’re not really facing it yet, because we don’t know what the economic effects will be, but we’ll certainly be mindful of that broader context when we make that decision … By the time the effects of a tightening in monetary policy take effect, the oil price shock is probably long gone, and you’re weighing on the economy at a time when it’s not appropriate. So the tendency is to look through any kind of a supply shock.”
Powell’s comments caused the Fed Funds futures to become more dovish, with the odds of a rate hike in April falling to a negligible amount from double digits just a few days ago. The December futures see no further action this year, although the odds favor a cut over a hike. A week ago, the December futures saw a 30% chance of a hike and a 6% chance of a cut. Today it is handicapping a 19% chance of a cut and a 4% chance of a hike. This is partially what is causing Treasury yields to work their way lower.
____________________________________________
Do you have a pipeline of non-QM locks you are looking to hedge? Or perhaps a portfolio of loans sitting on a conduit awaiting securitization? How do you hedge your exposure? A new paper from Eris Innovations on the topic outlines several methods used for hedging this growing market.
Hedging non-QM loans is different than conforming loans because they are not deliverable into a TBA. This means that hedging with TBAs can be ineffective. TBAs are probably better than nothing, but they aren’t the ideal solution. Other methods include using regression analysis to find the correct Treasury hedge, however this method is fraught with potential spurious errors or even non-sensical strategies due to data mining.
Another method hedgers have tried is estimating prepay speeds and using SOFR swap futures to hedge accordingly. There is a wealth of prepay models out there for conventional loans. The problem is that non-QM loans often have prepayment penalties which means existing prepay models are unsuitable, but this method aligns hedges with the hypothetical funding that would hold the loans to their repayment and as such is a very effective method.
The most advanced method is to use a discounted cash flow model using stochastic (i.e. probability) analysis. SOFR swap futures used to build the model are then used to hedge the portfolio. As a more precise method than the first three above, this method can result in the lowest hedging costs, and is the method of choice for sophisticated long term investors, but is equally effective for pipelines and inventory.
If you want to learn more about hedging non-QM portfolios, read this article or contact John.Douglas@erisfutures.com.
______________________________________________
Non-QM delinquencies are picking up according to the latest research from DV01. “Since reaching an impairment low in Summer 2022, the Non-QM market continues to deviate from overall mortgage market strength, with performance trends mirroring those of the weaker credit FHA and VA markets. The past two years represent the toughest stretch of performance in the sector’s history even as the broader mortgage universe was setting record-low delinquency rates in March 2023 and more recently in June 2024. This trend magnified substantially in February, with performance rapidly deteriorating.”
Impairments are highest in the 80+ LTV space, with bank statement / P&L products having the highest rates. DSCR seems to be behaving a bit better.

Overall delinquencies in the government-guaranteed space are well below pre-pandemic levels, so this issue seems to be specific to non-QM.
Home insurance premiums are driving increases in delinquencies and relocations, according to a new research paper. Note that rising insurance premiums can make DSCR ratios thinner than they otherwise appear, especially in the context of flat asking rents.
Insurance premiums are rising relative to P&I payments:

“When insurance premiums rise, homeowners have limited ways to respond,” the paper said. “They can shop for cheaper coverage by switching insurers. Some people relocate to areas where insurance is less expensive. However, income-constrained households may be less likely to shop for lower-cost insurance and may find moving out of reach.”
“Instead, higher premiums can lead to greater reliance on credit cards, delayed mortgage payments and potential home loss. Because mortgages constitute a substantial share of household debt and bank assets, rising delinquencies can threaten broader financial stability,” the authors said.
















