
Stocks are flattish after a higher-than-expected CPI. Bonds and MBS are down.
The consumer price index rose 0.4% MOM in October, according to the BLS. This was above the 0.3% forecast. Ex-food and energy, the index rose 0.3%, which was above the 0.2% forecast. Because of the government shutdown last year, there are no year-over-year numbers this month.
Shelter rose 0.3% and accounted for 30% of the increase in the index. The YOY increase in shelter CPI was 3.2% in September. IMO there is something wrong in the way BLS is calculating shelter CPI and they are overstating it by at least a percentage point on a YOY basis. The major real estate indices like Case-Shiller and FHFA show a 2% increase in prices. Median asking rents are flat YOY and average asking rents are up 1.5%. The idea that owner’s equivalent rent is rising 3.2% a year is baffling in this context.
Mortgage credit availability increased in October, according to the MBA’s Mortgage Credit Availability Index. “Mortgage credit availability ticked up in October after two months of declines, with greater availability of conventional credit while the government segment remained flat over the month,” said Joel Kan, MBA’s Vice President and Deputy Chief Economist. “With current mortgage rates still elevated, lenders increased their offerings of ARM loans for lower LTV borrowers, including some that allow for cash-out refinancing. This also boosted the jumbo index, which was up to its highest level in three months.”
Small business optimism fell slightly in October, according to the NFIB. “There was little change in optimism among small businesses in October as owners navigated enduring challenges, though there were some encouraging developments,” said NFIB Chief Economist Bill Dunkelberg. “Even with inflation pressures continuing to strain operations, more Main Street owners reported their businesses in good or excellent health, and actual sales improved. Looking ahead, continued strength in consumer spending will support economic growth, while persistent inflation, labor shortages, and policy risks will weigh on the small business outlook.”
Home equity reached a record high of $17.5 trillion, up 1.4% on a YOY basis, according to the ICE Mortgage Monitor. About 1 in 7 locks were cash-out refinances. “Homeowners are sitting on substantial housing wealth, with 2.4 million mortgage holders now holding at least $1 million in equity,” said Andy Walden, Head of Mortgage and Housing Market Research at ICE. “In a higher rate environment, cash-outs are making up a greater share of refinances, with those homeowners giving up historically low mortgage rates and taking on higher monthly payments to tap into their equity.”
An interesting tidbit from the report: Servicers retained 27% of refinances, down 4 percentage points from the prior quarter. Rate / term refinance retention fell 9 percentage points to 30% while cash-outs were flat at 26%. Servicers retained only 15% of cash-out refinances for 2019 vintages.
“Traditional rate-based retention strategies aren’t effective for borrowers who are motivated by access to equity rather than interest rate savings,” said Bob Hart, President of Mortgage Technology at ICE. “To retain these borrowers, servicers need better visibility into their equity positions and the ability to engage them before they look elsewhere. By combining ICE’s retention analytics with connected technologies like MSP, Servicing Digital and Encompass, we’re helping lenders and servicers identify opportunities, connect borrowers with financing options and keep those relationships intact.”
Servicing valuations have increased from about 4x the servicing strip prior to the pandemic to 6+ times after. Much of this jump in valuation has been due to servicing models valuing the retention (in other words, assigning a value to a potential refinance down the road). If the servicer isn’t getting that refinance, then the servicing is overvalued.
Richmond Fed President Tom Barkin said that the path of monetary policy is “relatively straightforward:” In sum, today, with demand healthy and inflation stubbornly elevated, the appropriate direction of monetary policy is relatively straightforward. However, risks to the demand outlook remain easy to envision. Because of that, it is wise to move policy with care.
The elephant in the room is AI. AI could under-deliver, causing repercussions in the financial markets, particularly stock valuations and credit spreads. As asset prices fall, consumers could pull back, negatively impacting demand. On the other hand, AI could over-deliver and we could see increased numbers of workers replaced, which would again negatively impact demand.
When Wall Street gets excited about some new technology or phenomenon, they rarely undershoot when it comes to valuations and potential. It is usually the opposite. The more likely scenario is that AI will fail to live up to the hype and these companies will survive and eventually the underlying business will catch up with the stock price. We saw it in 2000 when investors paid $77 per share for Cisco Systems, which was the Nvidia of its day. The bloom came off the rose, and it took 26 years for Cisco to return to that high. Cisco was dead money for a decade and a half.

We saw this with the Nifty Fifty stocks in the 1970s, and even during the Roaring 20s, when the Nvidia of its day was Radio Corporation of America (RCA). It peaked in 1929 and didn’t recover its previous peak until the mid 1960s.
The more likely scenario is that AI will under-deliver and the action in the stocks and the debt is signaling that is the more likely outcome.






















